Skip to content 
At Munro & Associates, safety isn’t just a rating—it’s a result of engineering decisions made at every level of design. In a recent demonstration, Sandy Munro tackled a common misconception head-on with nothing but a 16-pound sledgehammer: that steel is always stronger than aluminum. Through a series of live-impact tests comparing traditional steel stamp-welded components from a Tesla Model 3 with the aluminum castings from a Model Y, Sandy showed why aluminum castings are not only cost-effective but structurally superior in real-world crash scenarios.
This post unpacks that hands-on comparison and explores the engineering logic behind it—why aluminum castings are emerging as the smarter, safer choice in lean vehicle design.
A Demonstration with Impact
Sandy Munro opened his segment with unfiltered frustration toward critics who questioned the strength of aluminum castings. As a former engine designer, he’s heard these claims before—and this time, he responded not with charts or simulations, but brute-force experimentation.
The targets: longitudinal members (also known as frame rails) from the rear and front sections of two Tesla vehicles. The Model 3 used conventional steel stamp-and-weld construction. The Model Y featured Tesla’s newer gigacast rear and front structures—aluminum megacastings formed as a single, integrated unit.
Armed with a sledgehammer, Sandy struck each structure to simulate the kind of deformation that could occur in low-speed to moderate-impact collisions.
Rear Impact: Longitudinal Crush Zone Test
The first hit was to the rear longitudinal section of a Model 3. Sandy noted that these longitudinals are protected by a crush pack in light rear-end collisions (under 30 mph), which deforms to absorb energy before the primary frame rails are compromised.
Upon striking the Model 3’s steel rail, Sandy managed to create visible dents—even though the part was still welded into the vehicle body, giving it added rigidity. With two swings, he dented the rail enough to warrant concern about deformation—an outcome that could translate to expensive repairs or scrappage.
Next came the Model Y’s aluminum casting, tested in isolation (not mounted). Despite lacking the reinforcement of a full assembly, it barely registered the impact. The only visible effect was scraped-off paint. After a second hit in the same location, the result was the same: no structural deformation.
Front Shock Tower Test: Critical for Crash Energy Management
Sandy then turned to the front shock towers, another key safety structure in crashworthiness. These towers take on a critical role in distributing frontal impact loads through the body-in-white.
Striking the steel tower of the Model 3 yielded immediate damage—a noticeable dent and downward skewing that could compromise suspension alignment or steering geometry. Sandy noted that with only one or two more hits, the part would likely become structurally unsafe.
The aluminum casting in the Model Y again fared far better. While paint was removed and a minor chip appeared, there was no measurable deformation. This reinforced the conclusion that cast aluminum structures resist impact far better than legacy steel weldments under similar conditions.
Engineering Logic: Why Castings Excel
The key advantage of aluminum castings lies not just in material properties, but in how they’re shaped and used.
Unified Geometry
Gigacastings consolidate dozens of small stamped, welded, and bolted parts into a single large casting. This eliminates weak points created by weld seams and bolted joints. The uninterrupted structure is inherently more resistant to torsion and bending.
Load Distribution
A casting can be designed to distribute impact forces across multiple paths. This avoids concentration of energy in one area, reducing the chance of catastrophic failure during a crash. Traditional steel frames tend to have discrete load paths that focus stress into fewer, more failure-prone regions.
Controlled Failure Zones
Unlike a chaotic weldment that might crumple inconsistently, a casting can be engineered to deform in controlled ways. This improves energy absorption while preserving cabin integrity—critical for occupant safety.
Weight Advantage
Aluminum castings reduce weight without compromising strength. This lowers vehicle mass, improving both acceleration and energy efficiency—a win for electric vehicles where every kilogram counts.
Why the Myths Persist
Much of the skepticism toward cast aluminum comes from older automotive paradigms. For decades, stamped steel ruled the industry because it was cheap, predictable, and easier to repair. Engineers and insurers learned how to model and fix it.
But times have changed. EVs like the Tesla Model Y, which rely on castings, consistently earn top crash test ratings from bodies like the NHTSA and Euro NCAP. These results are not in spite of the castings—they’re because of them.
Sandy addressed this directly in the video:
“Stop thinking that in a crash you’re going to die with a casting. The casting is much stronger… Why didn’t I make engines out of welded sheet metal? Because they’d explode. Castings are better.”
The point is unambiguous: if aluminum castings can survive combustion chamber explosions in an engine, they’re certainly capable of handling crash energy in a vehicle frame.
Implications for Lean Manufacturing
From a lean engineering perspective, aluminum castings are transformative. By replacing 70–100 individual steel parts with a single casting, manufacturers reduce:
-
Assembly time
-
Tooling and labor costs
-
Error potential
-
Part variability
Tesla’s lead in this area is substantial. Their gigacasting approach is not just about crash safety—it’s about efficient, high-volume manufacturing. It’s a step-change in how cars are built, aligning with the lean design philosophies Munro & Associates has championed for decades.
Aluminum Castings Safety Test Takeaways
Whether you’re an OEM design engineer, an EV startup founder, or a curious investor, the lesson is clear: aluminum castings offer unmatched structural performance and simplify production.
Key takeaways:
-
Strength-to-weight ratio: Cast aluminum performs better under impact while reducing vehicle mass.
-
Manufacturing efficiency: Fewer parts, faster production, and better consistency.
-
Crash performance: Real-world teardown tests confirm higher resistance to deformation.
-
Sustainability potential: Lower weight = longer range = lower emissions over vehicle life.
Final Thoughts
This wasn’t a lab simulation or a marketing claim—it was a real-world, hands-on teardown demonstration using nothing more than physics, a sledgehammer, and Sandy Munro’s unapologetic clarity.
As EVs evolve, so too must the methods we use to build and assess them. Aluminum gigacastings aren’t just a trend—they’re the future of safe, efficient vehicle design.
Explore More with Munro
Interested in deeper insights into automotive teardown, cost reduction, and lean engineering?
Subscribe to Munro Live for weekly videos and follow our teardown series for data-driven reviews that go beyond the surface.
Or connect with Munro & Associates to learn how our team helps OEMs worldwide cut costs and improve performance through expert engineering analysis.