Ford’s BlueCruise driver assistance technology has come a long way. And based on a recent real-world review in the Mustang Mach-E GT, the latest version delivers an experience that rivals the best in the industry. While it may not yet be on par with Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Beta, BlueCruise has firmly established itself as one of the most refined and confidence-inspiring hands-free highway systems available today.
For automotive engineers, EV enthusiasts, and forward-looking investors alike, this evolution of Ford’s BlueCruise hands-free system signals that Ford is serious about delivering a lean, dependable, and competitive driver-assist technology.
Rapid Transition to Hands-Free Mode
One of the biggest improvements noted in the review was how quickly BlueCruise transitions to hands-free mode. There’s no need for complicated button sequences — once the system sees lane lines and determines road suitability, it activates with minimal input. The user simply sets a desired speed, and if conditions are right, BlueCruise displays a clear “Ready” status and shifts to full hands-free mode.
This is particularly helpful on long highway drives, where driver fatigue can set in. The reviewer mentioned cruising for 30 to 80 miles at a time without touching the wheel or pedals — a huge win for comfort and safety during extended travel.
Highway Performance That Feels Natural
The current generation of BlueCruise is optimized for freeways and interstates, where it can manage both steering and adaptive speed control. Reviewers praised its ability to smoothly handle curves that had previously disengaged the system. It now slows appropriately for turns, maintains smooth line tracking, and even apexes curves intelligently.
Moreover, BlueCruise introduces a subtle but smart feature known as lane biasing. Rather than sticking dead center between lanes, the vehicle slightly favors the side of the lane that keeps it farthest from adjacent traffic. This makes the experience feel more human and increases perceived safety for occupants — a psychological comfort factor that cannot be overstated.
Real-World Usability: The Mach-E GT as a Test Platform
The team tested BlueCruise in a 2024 Mustang Mach-E GT — a $76,000 AWD performance version with a 0-60 time of 3.5 seconds. Beyond the BlueCruise system itself, they noted impressive build quality and acceleration. Cloth seats with race-style bolsters offered surprising comfort and control, especially during aggressive maneuvers, and the overall cabin fit-and-finish met or exceeded expectations.
Critiques included minor gripes with physical interface elements. The team appreciated the tactile buttons used for cruise control, following distance, and lane keeping — even though some, like Sandy Munro, still prefer Tesla’s stalk-based simplicity. However, they did find the rotary shifter vague in operation and less confidence-inspiring than expected.
Smart Safety Features — But Sometimes Too Safe
BlueCruise aims to maximize safety — sometimes to a fault. For instance, the system actively reads road signs and construction cues, automatically adjusting speed downward even when the driver sets a higher limit. While this is a valuable safety measure, it can frustrate drivers who prefer to exceed posted limits in non-enforced zones.
The system also uses face-tracking sensors to ensure the driver stays alert. If the driver looks away too long — even while wearing sunglasses — the system issues a “watch the road” warning. Holding a phone in front of the face or engaging too long with a passenger can also trigger these alerts.
For safety-conscious users (or those with concerned passengers), this hands-on monitoring adds peace of mind. But for drivers who prefer more autonomy over autonomy, it can feel overprotective.
Improved Lane Changes and Curve Handling
Another major improvement is BlueCruise’s behavior during lane changes. With a light touch on the signal, the system now searches for a safe opening and initiates the change smoothly. It waits for the right gap before moving and re-centers itself with no user intervention.
During curve-heavy segments — especially on I-75 in Michigan, where older BlueCruise versions struggled — the new system maintained lane position and engaged hands-free mode consistently. In previous iterations, these same curves caused disengagement, requiring driver intervention. This is a substantial functional leap forward.
Adaptive Cruise Control Beyond the Pavement
On back roads and even unpaved Michigan dirt roads, BlueCruise disables its lateral control but retains adaptive cruise. While the vehicle won’t steer for you, it still uses sensors to maintain a safe following distance. For areas where painted lane lines are absent or inconsistent, this hybrid mode ensures BlueCruise remains useful.
Even in complex scenarios — such as diverging diamond interchanges or intersections with mixed or missing lane markings — the system maintained straight-line tracking without the “ping-pong” effect common in less advanced ADAS systems.
Human-Machine Interface (HMI): Mostly Intuitive
The driver interface was found to be mostly intuitive. BlueCruise communicates status clearly through the digital cluster, and drivers can make quick adjustments via steering wheel buttons. One drawback mentioned was needing to set cruise speed manually each time — it doesn’t remember previous speed preferences. However, the learning curve is minimal, and users quickly adapted to its behavior.
The system’s visual indicators, such as green bars or “hands-free” messages, make it clear when control transitions are happening. This transparency helps build trust in the system — an essential factor in adoption.
Comparative Positioning: Behind Tesla, Ahead of Others
The reviewers were unanimous in their view that Tesla still leads the hands-free driving field with its FSD Beta — particularly in terms of urban navigation and full autonomy ambitions. However, they also agreed that comparing BlueCruise to FSD Beta isn’t apples to apples. BlueCruise focuses specifically on highway performance and excels in that space.
Among the rest of the pack — including GM’s Super Cruise, Hyundai’s Highway Driving Assist, and others — BlueCruise is now arguably in second place. It’s consistent, easy to use, and backed by continuous updates. That level of polish, combined with real-world improvement over previous versions, makes it one of the most compelling hands-free systems for highway travel.
Final Verdict: Safe, Smooth, and Confidence-Inspiring
Ford’s BlueCruise has matured into a truly roadworthy assistant. It handles real-world complexities — like curvy interstates, missing lane lines, and changing speed zones — with grace. It’s not designed to replace the driver, but to reduce fatigue and improve safety, especially on long hauls.
Whether you’re an engineer dissecting ADAS logic, an EV investor tracking Ford’s strategic edge, or just someone considering a tech-forward EV like the Mustang Mach-E, BlueCruise is a system worth watching.
Explore More with Munro
For more insights into Ford’s BlueCruise evolution — or to compare it with systems from Tesla, GM, or Hyundai — subscribe to Munro Live or check out Munro & Associates. Our teardown experts deliver hands-on analysis, lean design breakdowns, and real-world testing to give you the unfiltered truth.