Skip to content 
Recently, the team at Munro tackled a surprising development in the EV world — Audi’s decision to eliminate the heat pump from its Q4 E-Tron, replacing it with a resistive heater. Officially, the automaker cites supply chain and semiconductor shortages. However, Munro & Associates takes a deeper look at whether technical performance and cost considerations might be the real driving forces.
Understanding the Role of Heat Pumps in EVs
Heat pumps are a cornerstone of efficient cold-weather performance in electric vehicles. Unlike resistive heaters, which directly convert electrical energy into heat at a coefficient of performance (COP) of about 1.0, heat pumps operate more like air conditioning systems in reverse. By transferring heat from the outside air into the cabin, they can achieve a COP around 3.0 — meaning they deliver roughly three units of heat for every unit of electrical energy consumed.
In cold climates, this efficiency translates into tangible range benefits. For many EVs, using a resistive heater in winter can cause up to a 30% loss in driving range. With a heat pump, that loss can be reduced by about a third. Tesla’s Model Y, for example, has demonstrated improved cold-weather performance thanks to its integrated Octovalve-based heat pump system.
The Audi Q4 E-Tron’s Thermal Management
The Q4 E-Tron, built on Volkswagen Group’s MEB platform, shares much of its architecture with the VW ID.4. The 2022 Q4 E-Tron reviewed by Munro featured eight visible valve assemblies in the engine bay, consistent with a heat pump-equipped system. These valves, along with a larger electric A/C compressor, are indicators of an active heat pump setup.
The Q4’s heat pump configuration, however, reflects a less integrated approach than Tesla’s Octovalve. Instead of consolidating functions into a single unit, components are distributed throughout the engine bay — an approach that adds complexity and weight.
Why Audi Might Be Dropping the Heat Pump
Audi’s official explanation points to chip shortages and supply chain constraints. In the early days of the pandemic, these factors legitimately disrupted global automotive production. However, the Munro team notes that semiconductor supply has largely recovered, with some analysts even reporting a surplus.
This raises the question — is Audi’s decision really about parts availability, or is it about performance and cost?
Performance Concerns
Volkswagen faced criticism when it offered the heat pump as a $1,000 option on the ID.4. Owners reported minimal real-world efficiency gains, even in side-by-side cold-weather tests. Videos and forum posts documented negligible differences between vehicles equipped with heat pumps and those without. Ultimately, VW issued refunds and acknowledged that the system’s benefits were less than advertised.
If the Q4 E-Tron’s heat pump shares the same architecture and performance profile, Audi may be eliminating it to avoid similar backlash.
Cost and Complexity
Heat pumps are inherently more complex than resistive heaters. They require additional valves, refrigerant lines, and control systems, all of which add cost and assembly labor. Removing the heat pump streamlines production, reduces vehicle cost, and eliminates a component that may not deliver its promised advantage in typical driving conditions.
In markets where winter temperatures are moderate, the real-world benefit of a heat pump may not justify its added expense. For a premium brand like Audi, balancing luxury expectations with competitive pricing is critical.
How Resistive Heating Changes the Equation
While less efficient, resistive heaters offer simplicity and reliability. They heat up quickly, require fewer parts, and are less prone to leaks or mechanical failure. For drivers in milder climates — or those with regular charging access — the extra energy draw is less of a concern.
However, for Q4 E-Tron owners in colder regions, the shift to resistive heating could mean planning for shorter winter range. Frequent highway drivers or those relying on public charging may notice the difference most.
Lessons from Tesla and Other OEMs
Tesla’s approach to heat pumps demonstrates that efficiency gains are possible when the system is fully integrated into the vehicle’s thermal architecture. The Octovalve combines multiple functions — cabin heating, battery conditioning, and motor cooling — into a single manifold, reducing complexity while maximizing performance.
Other manufacturers, like Jaguar with the I-Pace and Nissan with the Leaf, initially deployed more conventional, less integrated heat pump systems. These early designs were bulky and inefficient by comparison, showing the importance of execution, not just technology choice.
Munro’s Perspective
The Munro team believes Audi’s decision is likely more strategic than Audi admits. The supply chain narrative may be a convenient cover for removing a system that underperforms, adds unnecessary cost, and complicates manufacturing.
From a lean design standpoint, every component in a vehicle should justify its existence by delivering measurable performance, improving safety, or enhancing customer satisfaction. If a part fails to meet those benchmarks, removing it can be a smart move — even if it means losing a perceived “premium” feature.
What This Means for EV Buyers
For prospective Q4 E-Tron buyers:
-
Cold climate drivers may need to budget for more frequent charging in winter months.
-
Mild climate drivers will likely notice little impact in everyday use.
-
Resale value could be influenced if the market perceives heat pump-equipped models as more desirable in colder regions.
Ultimately, buyers should weigh the cost savings against potential range loss and consider how their local climate and driving habits will influence their experience.
The Bigger Industry Trend
The Q4 E-Tron’s heat pump removal reflects a broader industry reality: automakers are continually reassessing the cost-benefit ratio of every technology in their vehicles. In the EV era, efficiency is king — but efficiency must be real, measurable, and worth the investment.
As OEMs refine their designs and learn from real-world performance data, expect more shifts in standard equipment lists. Some features will vanish quietly; others will be replaced with better-engineered solutions.
Discover How Design Decisions Determine Your Drive
Want deeper insights into EV engineering decisions? Subscribe to Munro Live and explore Munro & Associates for more teardowns, technical breakdowns, and behind-the-scenes analyses of how automakers balance cost, complexity, and performance.