Skip to content 
Tesla’s battery innovations continue to lead the electric vehicle (EV) industry, and nowhere is this more evident than in the 4680 cell configuration found in the Cybertruck. In a recent teardown by Munro & Associates, we dove deep into the Cybertruck’s 4680 battery pack, drawing critical comparisons to the Model Y’s structural pack. This detailed breakdown not only reveals Tesla’s evolving battery architecture but also offers valuable insights for engineers, EV enthusiasts, and investors interested in the cutting edge of lean manufacturing and automotive technology.
A New Standard: 192S7P in the Cybertruck
At the core of the teardown lies a revelation in pack design. The Cybertruck’s battery pack is organized in a 192S7P (192 cells in series, 7 in parallel) configuration, totaling 1,344 cylindrical 4680 cells. This design results in a pack capable of reaching an estimated 800 volts—doubling the voltage range of the Model Y, which uses a 92S9P configuration and totals 828 cells.
This doubling of series connections (from 92 to 192) enables higher voltage operation, which reduces current for the same power output. Lower current translates to reduced resistive losses, thinner cabling, and improved efficiency—crucial for off-road performance and towing in the Cybertruck’s use case.
Modular Power: Dynamic Reconfiguration
One of the standout features of Tesla’s Cybertruck battery pack is its ability to dynamically reorganize itself. While it operates natively at 800 volts, the pack can split into two 400-volt packs in parallel. This is a clever adaptation to the limitations of the current U.S. charging infrastructure, which predominantly supports 400-volt DC fast charging.
By allowing the pack to adapt to the voltage of the charging station, Tesla maximizes compatibility and ensures that owners experience rapid charging regardless of station type. This feature mirrors—but inverts—the approach used in the GMC Hummer EV, which normally runs at 400 volts but can reorganize to charge at 800 volts when appropriate.
Mechanical Insights: Simplified vs Interconnected
The teardown analysis also uncovered mechanical and structural advantages in Tesla’s latest battery design. In contrast to the Model Y’s 9P configuration—where cell groups span multiple rows and interconnect through partial overlaps—the Cybertruck’s 7P rows are completely self-contained.
This autonomy simplifies the disassembly process and reduces interdependencies between rows, which is beneficial not just for repair and maintenance but also for safety and manufacturing repeatability. The self-contained 7-cell rows minimize the electrical complexity during assembly and allow easier modular testing.
Cooling Architecture: Familiar Yet Refined
Tesla retained a familiar serpentine cooling pipe design in the Cybertruck, similar to the one used in the Model Y. Each cooling pipe weaves between two rows of cells, and the pack features three such pipes, serving six columns. This layout balances cooling performance with manufacturability.
However, there are material differences in thermal insulation and packaging. The Cybertruck utilizes a different encapsulant—likely polyurethane, colored blue-green—compared to the pink polyurethane in the Model Y. This distinction may influence thermal conductivity, structural adhesion, or fire mitigation characteristics.
Form Follows Function: Inverted Tray Design
One of the most intriguing differences lies in the battery orientation and structural enclosure. While the Model Y features a bottom-up structural battery tray, the Cybertruck’s pack is flipped. Its protective enclosure is now on top relative to the installed orientation, allowing Tesla to use the bottom void space as an integrated venting and buffering zone.
This clever inversion eliminates the need for additional trays or blowout structures. In the event of thermal runaway, gases can be safely expelled through purpose-built vent paths, facilitated by the ample underbody cavity. This design not only enhances safety but also boosts manufacturing efficiency by simplifying the structure.
Off-Road Design Tradeoffs
The Cybertruck’s battery design reflects its rugged mission. With higher ground clearance requirements and greater shock exposure, the battery pack incorporates a raised skid plate and larger vent troughs. These features offer protection against road debris and space for controlled venting during a thermal event.
Although it might appear that unused space in the pack could house more cells, the design clearly prioritizes safety, durability, and modularity over raw energy density. Tesla could theoretically switch to longer cells—such as 4695s—but the current setup provides a buffer zone that is critical for off-road applications.
Material and Manufacturing Considerations
Our teardown wouldn’t be complete without a word from Aaron Wiegel, President and CEO of Wiegel, highlighting advanced stamping and assembly technologies used in battery manufacturing. Wiegel’s patented roll welding and progressive die capabilities support Tesla’s lean manufacturing strategy by enabling precision-built current collectors and cell interconnects.
Tesla’s pack design reflects these values: maximizing functional density while reducing unnecessary complexity. The use of in-house or partner-manufactured components supports better quality control and cost management—essential for scalability.
Model Y vs. Cybertruck: A Comparison Table
| Feature | Model Y Structural Pack | Cybertruck Battery Pack |
|---|---|---|
| Cell Format | 4680 | 4680 |
| Configuration (S x P) | 92S9P | 192S7P |
| Total Cells | 828 | 1344 |
| Nominal Voltage | ~360V | ~700V–800V |
| Cooling Pipes | 3 (serving 6 columns) | 3 (similar layout) |
| Pack Orientation | Upright (cover on top) | Inverted (cover on bottom) |
| Fast Charge Strategy | Fixed 400V | Dynamic 400V/800V |
| Venting Mechanism | Tray & blowout port | Structural void-based |
| Maintenance Modularity | Limited by 9P overlap | Improved via 7P autonomy |
Cybertruck Battery Teardown Takeaways
Tesla’s Cybertruck battery pack represents a significant evolution in structural battery design. Engineers will appreciate the move toward simplified modularity, increased voltage, and integrated cooling and venting mechanisms. The dynamic voltage reconfiguration exemplifies smart electrical architecture that adapts to real-world infrastructure challenges.
For investors, the teardown underscores Tesla’s continued push toward vertical integration and lean manufacturing. With fewer parts, simplified layouts, and higher performance metrics, Tesla’s innovations reflect cost-effective scalability—key to unlocking profit margins in high-volume EV production.
Conclusion: Teardown Reveals the Future of Tesla Packs
Tesla’s shift from the Model Y’s 92S9P structural pack to the Cybertruck’s 192S7P configuration shows a clear strategy: increase performance, simplify modularity, and future-proof charging compatibility. Through smart design choices—from voltage scaling and cooling to structural packaging—Tesla continues to redefine the benchmark for EV battery innovation.
Want more teardown insights?
Subscribe to Munro Live or check out Munro & Associates for expert EV breakdowns, lean manufacturing lessons, and exclusive behind-the-scenes footage. See what’s next in electric vehicle technology—one bolt at a time.