Skip to content 
Electric vehicles are winning the market share race, but their charging units remain the underappreciated, under-engineered, and underperforming weak link in the transition. Walk into a public charging lot in North America and you’ll see the same thing — rows of hardware meant to be the gas pump of the future, too often sitting idle with an “out of service” sticker or glitching through endless resets. For all the capital poured into EV development, the charging ecosystem still feels like a field experiment.
At Munro & Associates, our teardown lens doesn’t just stop at the vehicle. We study the entire ecosystem of technology surrounding EVs, and charging units stand out as a space where design maturity is lagging far behind adoption curves.
A Patchwork of Standards
The most obvious friction point is standards. Tesla has the North American Charging Standard (NACS), and its Supercharger network sets the gold benchmark for reliability and uptime. The rest of the industry, meanwhile, has fragmented between CCS, CHAdeMO (fading fast), and regional quirks. Every connector design is a statement about politics as much as engineering, and customers feel that pain when one plug works and another doesn’t.
It’s not just connectors. Payment systems vary wildly: swipe, tap, apps, subscriptions, or QR codes that fail in poor lighting. Consumers don’t care about backend politics — they want to plug in and charge, as easily as they swipe a debit card at a gas station. Right now, that isn’t happening.
Reliability — or the Lack Thereof
Reliability statistics are the real indictment. Studies show uptime across many charging networks hovering around 70–80%. Imagine if a gas station pump only worked 4 out of 5 times — consumers would riot. EV drivers, especially in colder climates where range loss is significant, live with real anxiety that their planned charging stop might turn into a wasted detour.
This is a design and manufacturing challenge, not a consumer patience challenge. Connectors are often exposed to weather without sufficient sealing. Screens and payment systems fail under sunlight glare or cold stress. Power modules are stressed by thermal cycling and inadequate cooling. Many chargers are being treated like consumer electronics rather than critical infrastructure, and the results show it.
Power Wars: Fast vs. Practical
Another point: the industry is obsessed with chasing maximum charging speed, sometimes at the expense of what most drivers actually need. Yes, 350 kW DC fast charging makes headlines. But most drivers don’t live their lives on long-haul road trips; they want reliable, moderately fast charging at predictable locations—workplaces, grocery stores, apartment complexes.
The fixation on ultra-fast charging has created a two-tier infrastructure: Tesla drivers get a balance of placement and power, while the rest are left with either slow, scattered Level 2s or headline-grabbing but fragile “fast chargers” that rarely deliver their rated output. If lean design teaches us anything, it’s that function matched to use-case beats spec-sheet overkill every time.
The Opportunity for Lean Engineering
This is where Munro’s perspective matters. Teardowns reveal that charging units are filled with redundant modules, overly complex cooling systems, and off-the-shelf components never meant for constant outdoor duty. There’s an urgent opportunity for leaner, more reliable design:
- Simplify electronics modules to minimize points of failure.
- Improve sealing and weather protection to automotive-grade standards.
- Standardize payment and software protocols so the user experience isn’t a lottery.
- Design with serviceability in mind—chargers should be as easy to repair as swapping a module, not a multi-hour ordeal.
The industry is in its adolescence, with multiple design philosophies colliding. But the lesson from EV powertrains applies here: the winner isn’t the flashiest, it’s the most manufacturable, reliable, and cost-effective design scaled across millions of units.
A Reality Check
Right now, charging units are where EVs themselves were 10–15 years ago: full of promise, but frustrating in practice. Until reliability, standardization, and leaner engineering become the focus, EV adoption will be slowed not by consumer demand, but by the weakest link in the chain — the charger.
The message is simple: automakers can’t outsource this forever. Tesla proved that by building its own charging ecosystem. If the rest of the industry expects parity, they can’t keep waiting on third-party networks patching together semi-reliable solutions. Either OEMs start tearing down, designing, and standardizing their own charging hardware, or they risk leaving their customers stranded on the side of the road.
The charging unit is no longer “infrastructure.” It’s part of the vehicle experience, as critical as a drivetrain or a steering rack. Treat it with anything less than that seriousness, and the EV transition falters.
Conclusion: Time to Tear Down the Status Quo
EV charging units are at a crossroads. Reliability lags, standards fracture, and consumer trust wavers. But lean design principles can change that story. Strip complexity, design for serviceability, and build like it’s infrastructure — not a gadget. At Munro & Associates, we’ve learned that every overlooked part in a system eventually becomes the bottleneck. Today, that bottleneck is the charger.
The fix isn’t more hype about 350 kW. The fix is building chargers that work, every time, for everyone. Until then, the EV revolution will run not on electricity, but on patience — and patience is a finite resource.
Explore More with Munro
Want deeper teardown insights into the technology shaping EV adoption? Follow Munro Live for expert analysis, cost breakdowns, and lean engineering perspectives that cut through the hype.