Skip to content 
The future of EV batteries is shaped by real tradeoffs, not hype. In a recent Munro discussion, engineers compared chemistries, pack architectures, and manufacturing methods with an eye toward cost, reliability, and scale — exactly the lens Munro readers value. In this article, we distill those points into practical takeaways for engineers, EV enthusiasts, and investors tracking the future of EV batteries.
Cell-to-Pack vs Modules: Cost today, flexibility tomorrow
Going cell-to-pack can trim cost and reduce assembly steps; vertical integrators like BYD and Tesla have leaned into structural packs that load cells directly into the pack housing. The payoff is simpler hardware and fewer operations. The catch is serviceability and reuse. Modules let you swap, grade, and redeploy sub-assemblies in stationary storage; cell-to-pack often turns the whole pack into a single replaceable unit. For fleets, recyclers, and second-life operators, that modularity can be worth the added parts and complexity. Munro’s team underscored both sides of this tradeoff — lower part count now versus better end-of-life options later.
Cylindrical, prismatic, pouch: Packaging drives process
Form factor is more than a packaging choice; it determines how you build and cool the pack. Same-side interconnects and top-side only welding improve throughput because you avoid flip operations that add time without adding value. Prismatic cans with accessible tabs support single-sided assembly; pouch cells squeeze higher energy density into a given volume but demand an exoskeleton and careful compression management. The “manufacturability first” theme recurs throughout Munro’s teardown work — design the cell, busbar, and cooling interfaces so the factory never has to handle the pack twice if once will do.
LFP, NMC, and the money trail to LMR and sodium-ion
Chemistry choices remain a cost versus energy-density puzzle. LFP wins on price, thermal behavior, and supply security; NMC offers higher specific energy but brings cobalt cost and sourcing risks. Munro’s panel stressed a pragmatic rule for what’s next: follow the capital expenditures. Lithium-manganese-rich (LMR) and sodium-ion are drawing real plant investment, signaling credible medium-term cost paths even if nameplate energy density lags today’s high-nickel cells. Expect incremental price declines, not miracles; even if a lab-grade chemistry could slash costs dramatically, market pricing will move gradually as capacity scales and competitors respond.
Solid-state: Safer by design, tough at scale
Solid-state batteries promise improved safety and higher energy density; they also face non-trivial hurdles like stack expansion, interface resistance, and manufacturability at volume. Dry electrolyte processes and related equipment may help, but they upend today’s slurry-coating plus long-oven paradigm. Until vendors prove stable, high-yield production on automotive lines, treat solid-state as a carefully watched roadmap item — not a near-term cornerstone of your product plan.
Dry coating: Where process beats materials
Manufacturing can change the cost curve as much as chemistry. Traditional wet coating relies on solvents, long drying ovens, and energy-intensive recovery systems. Dry-coated electrodes skip solvent drying, shrinking equipment footprints and utility bills while simplifying environmental controls. That improvement doesn’t need a breakthrough material; it needs disciplined process integration from mixing through calendaring and winding. For program managers chasing cost-per-kWh targets, this is one of the most leverage-rich changes to evaluate with suppliers.
400 V vs 800 V: Not a silver bullet
Doubling pack voltage doesn’t automatically halve cost. Motors must still deliver torque; cutting current forces more turns and insulation, eroding the wire-size benefits. Higher voltage also adds insulation and safety requirements throughout the vehicle. OEMs still migrate to 800 V for specific wins — faster DC charging, some cable savings, future-proofing power electronics — but a mature 400 V supply base can equalize total system cost. The right answer is application-specific: drive cycle, charging strategy, and platform commonality matter more than spec-sheet one-upmanship.
Fast charging and battery life: Field data over fear
Lab tests once suggested that frequent fast charging would dramatically shorten battery life. Real-world data over a decade shows a more modest effect. The biggest life extenders remain the basics: keep average SOC moderate, avoid chronic 100% charges, and manage pack temperature. For drivers, occasional DC fast charging is fine; for fleets, use charging profiles and thermal budgets that fit mission timing without oversizing the pack. Infrastructure remains the pinch point on holiday peaks — not technical battery limits.
Materials, magnets, and supply: Design for resilience
Beyond lithium, watch constraints in processed graphite, copper, and magnet materials. Domesticating processing — from graphite to magnet alloys — reduces geopolitical risk. Parallel R&D on rare-earth-free magnets indicates long-term relief routes. For vehicle programs with 5–8 year lives, dual-source critical materials when possible, specify recyclable formulations, and align pack architectures with likely second-life markets to improve total lifecycle ROI.
Reuse before recycle
When packs hit ~80% of original capacity, stationary storage can unlock years of second-life service with gentle duty cycles. Modularity helps: pulling matched modules into standardized racks beats disassembling monolithic packs. Eventually, black-mass recovery and metal separation close the loop; until volumes and commodity prices make recycling consistently profitable, reuse plus selective refurbishing offers the best near-term economics. Design today’s packs with tomorrow’s stationary interfaces in mind.
Takeaways for the Future of EV Batteries
- Pick architecture by lifecycle, not fad. If second-life and serviceability are strategic, favor modules; if cost and stiffness dominate, evaluate structural cell-to-pack with known end-of-life tradeoffs.
- Follow capex, not headlines. LMR and sodium-ion look credible where factories are funded; expect incremental, steady $/kWh declines.
- Invest in process. Dry electrode coating can drop cost and footprint without changing your chemistry bill of materials.
- Voltage is a system choice. Model the entire powertrain and charging profile before jumping to 800 V.
- Engineer for reuse. Standardize module formats and interfaces to harvest second-life value before recycling.
Explore More With Munro
Want deeper teardown data, cost curves, and manufacturability insights behind these recommendations? Whether you’re an engineer or an enthusiast, there’s always more to uncover in the world of next-gen mobility. For expert reviews and in-depth analysis, visit Munro & Associates or subscribe to Munro Live today to see where design and process deliver the next big wins.