Hyundai IONIQ 9 Interior Review: Polished Execution or Overbuilt Complexity?

The Hyundai IONIQ 9 enters the electric vehicle market as a premium three-row offering with a price tag around $80,000. With such a high benchmark, expectations for both styling and engineering execution are equally elevated. This teardown review focuses on the IONIQ 9’s interior and how it reflects Hyundai’s evolving design language, material selection, and manufacturing priorities. From high-end finishes to questionable ergonomics, the vehicle provides a rich case study for automotive engineers and EV enthusiasts alike.

Blurred Lines Between SUV and Minivan

From the exterior, the IONIQ 9 walks a fine line between SUV and minivan. Its side profile, dominated by a sloping roofline and broad panel breakup, leans more toward a family hauler than a rugged utility vehicle. Key to this perception is the use of multiple black accent bands and panel layers that create a segmented, almost patchwork aesthetic. Rather than unifying the design, these layers introduce visual clutter.

This design fragmentation extends beyond aesthetics. Engineers had to work with a proliferation of unique components: fender main panels, wheel arch liners, decorative inlays, and multiple moldings — all separate parts. While some lower trims may use contrasting colors to justify these pieces, the high-end trim reviewed here maintains a single-color scheme. That raises the question: Why invest in expensive tooling and complex assembly if the visual payoff is minimal at the top end?

Execution Over Ideation: Praise for Engineering

Design criticisms aside, the execution of these components deserves recognition. Fit and finish across material boundaries — such as vinyl-wrapped panels meeting injection-molded plastics — are consistently well-hidden. This reflects high craftsmanship in tolerancing and mating part surfaces, particularly given the different design constraints imposed by each material. One visible flaw — a mismatch in the radii between upper and lower panels — is well-concealed within a return edge. This is no small feat given the interplay of multiple textures and finishes in modern interiors.

Such precision indicates a deep alignment between the design studio’s aesthetic goals and the engineering team’s capabilities. In high-end EVs, this collaboration is critical. Any gap in translation between vision and manufacturability results in poor consumer perception and costly rework.

Material Choices That Justify the Price

The IONIQ 9 showcases premium interior touches consistent with its pricing tier. The upper door panel features a wrapped and padded surface, contrasting with the lower injection-molded gray plastic. The transitions are seamless, visually clean, and tactilely refined. This choice not only adds perceived value but also reinforces Hyundai’s understanding of what buyers in this segment expect.

A standout detail is the door trim plate. Rather than defaulting to generic piano black plastics seen across many lineups, Hyundai color-matched the trim plate to the interior. This element, specific to each interior color package, aligns with the vehicle’s design integrity. While this adds to the bill of materials and reduces commonality across trims, it elevates the user experience in a way that matters — especially for a premium buyer.

Functional Features Meet Questionable Ergonomics

The seats — ventilated and featuring a leg support extension — deliver on the comfort promise. But some decisions feel less refined. The two-tone seatback features a gray and white split that interrupts the visual continuity of the side bolsters. Misalignments here, even if minor, draw the eye and may suggest a lack of design intent rather than a deliberate feature.

On the center console, familiar criticisms arise. Hyundai and Kia vehicles have long struggled with overbuilt center storage assemblies. In this model, the console is adjustable — a useful touch — but the underlying structure remains unnecessarily complex. Excessive screws, return curves, and compartmentalized layers introduce cost and assembly difficulty without delivering clear user benefit.

Storage That Surprises and Confounds

One of the more intriguing discoveries lies in the hidden storage. The main center bin includes an upper tray and a deeper lower compartment, divided into front and rear zones by a removable wall. The depth is significant — an adult arm can reach all the way through — but the design introduces usability concerns. Items placed far forward become difficult to access, especially for the driver.

From a design perspective, this represents a tension between maximizing storage and maintaining safety. While rear passengers can more easily reach into the compartment, doing so while the vehicle is in motion could present a distraction. This raises a key question for engineers: Should storage features favor capacity or accessibility?

Rear Seat Refinement and Structure

The second-row seats offer unexpectedly high comfort, especially in shoulder and head support. This is impressive considering their dual function. These seats must not only provide comfort but also fold flat to create a uniform load floor — a feature more often seen in minivans than SUVs.

To achieve this, the hinge point sits higher on the seatback, requiring a bespoke seat structure not shared with front-row assemblies. The engineering complexity increases significantly, as does the unit cost. However, the result is a flexible cabin environment suitable for large families, gear transport, or road trips — exactly the use cases Hyundai likely had in mind for this vehicle.

Another thoughtful feature is the ability to recline the rear seatback across multiple positions. This allows passengers to find their ideal angle — a valuable amenity on long drives. While this functionality isn’t groundbreaking, its inclusion in a three-row EV is commendable.

Lighting and Ambience

Although only briefly mentioned, the ambient lighting in the vehicle features a purple-blue-red palette reminiscent of retro aesthetics. Described as “a hipster’s apartment in the late 1980s,” the styling cue may divide opinion. It’s clear Hyundai is trying to infuse personality and modern flair — whether that succeeds will depend on customer taste.

The Verdict: Is It Worth the Price?

In sum, the Hyundai IONIQ 9 offers a refined and impressively executed interior, albeit with some questionable design decisions and overengineering in certain areas. The material choices, seat comfort, and build quality match expectations for a luxury EV. The engineering team clearly rose to the challenge of delivering precision-fit components across multiple materials — a hallmark of high-end manufacturing.

Yet, the design team’s layering choices and segmented exterior styling may not appeal to all buyers. The Tupperware joke might be exaggerated, but it speaks to a broader skepticism about the visual language of the vehicle.

Hyundai IONIQ 9 Interior Teardown Takeaways

• Fit and Finish Excellence: Material transitions are seamless and expertly masked.

• Engineering Discipline: Complex structures meet high manufacturing quality.

• Design Overload: Too many visual layers reduce the coherence of exterior styling.

• Seat Innovation: Rear seat structures are highly functional and comfort-forward.

• Storage Access: Impressive capacity, but not without ergonomic compromise.

Team Up With Munro

Explore more expert EV teardowns, material reviews, and design analyses with Munro. Whether you’re an engineer, designer, or enthusiast, Munro & Associates offers unmatched insight into the future of electric mobility. Subscribe to Munro Live or visit our website for deep dives into the vehicles shaping tomorrow’s roads.