Skip to content 
In the latest walkthrough from the North American International Auto Show, Munro & Associates caught up with Josiah from Sundberg-Ferar to explore the design philosophy behind the Ford Maverick — a compact pickup truck that’s turning heads for its radically simplified interior. Unlike its competitors that chase complexity for perceived luxury, the Maverick embraces a lean design approach. This teardown-inspired exploration of its interior and styling choices reveals not only smart cost-saving decisions but also meaningful gains in usability, durability, and manufacturability — all principles that align with Munro & Associates’ mission.
Functional Aesthetics Over Cosmetic Excess
The standout feature of the Ford Maverick isn’t what you see — it’s what you don’t. Where many OEMs layer material on top of material, the Maverick strips back. Instead of multi-layered door panels with overlapping medallions, padded top rolls, and decorative inlays, the Maverick opts for a single injection-molded carrier. This part maintains a visual and tactile appeal with a woven, canvas-like texture molded directly into the hard plastic — eliminating the need for additional wrapping or foam.
This not only reduces material usage but simplifies tooling, lowers part thickness, and cuts down on total door weight. According to Josiah, some door panels can reach up to 10mm thick due to overlapping components. The Maverick’s approach resets this standard — streamlining the interior down to what’s actually needed without sacrificing functional appeal.
Lean Manufacturing Principles in Practice
Munro has long emphasized the relationship between design decisions and manufacturing cost. The Maverick’s interior exemplifies this by reducing the number of parts, attachment features, and separate finishes throughout the cabin. The door panel, for instance, acts as both structural and aesthetic surface — no secondary decorative pieces required. This saves weight and material while simplifying the supply chain.
The same thinking extends to the center console. Typically a complex assembly with multiple snap-fit components and brackets, the Maverick’s is instead a one-piece molded structure with a few trim inserts. Clever surface detailing gives the illusion of complexity, including character lines that mimic traditional part breaks — but it’s all one piece. This makes the console lighter, cheaper to produce, and dramatically easier to clean — a win for both manufacturers and owners.
Usability Without the Gloss
Too often, OEMs equate high-end interiors with glossy finishes and unnecessary ornamentation. The Maverick avoids common pitfalls like piano black trim, which easily scratches and smudges. Instead, it uses a robust graining texture throughout — durable, utilitarian, and appropriate for a compact utility vehicle.
This approach enhances usability while reinforcing the vehicle’s value proposition. The interior feels cohesive, practical, and thoughtfully engineered. No part feels overdesigned or redundant — a philosophy that automotive engineers and teardown analysts can appreciate.
Weight Savings That Benefit Everyone
By eliminating redundant layers and structures, the Maverick achieves meaningful weight reductions. A lighter door panel, simplified console, and integrated instrument panel (IP) all contribute to a leaner vehicle. The IP itself serves as both the structural base and aesthetic surface — no separate upper or lower pads, no unnecessary substructure.
Weight savings aren’t just a bonus for OEMs — they’re critical for fuel economy, ride quality, and overall performance. Every pound saved without compromising functionality is a step toward a better product.
The Ripple Effects of Design Choices
One of the most illuminating comparisons made during the interview involved a Mustang Dark Horse, which required an additional side lamp to meet 45-degree turn signal visibility regulations. The reason? A stylistic front-end decision made early in the design process. This is where Sundberg-Ferar’s insights shine — highlighting how aesthetic choices often carry unseen engineering costs.
Instead of integrating the side signal into the headlamp, the dramatic shaping of the fascia demanded a standalone unit — more wiring, more parts, more cost. According to Josiah, experienced designers should understand these trade-offs early on, ideally before committing to theme sketches. Doing so allows for clever, regulation-compliant solutions without resorting to added components.
Bridging the Studio and the Shop Floor
A recurring theme in the discussion is the disconnect that sometimes exists between design studios and engineering teams. Once a sketch is finalized, there’s a reluctance — from both sides — to challenge it. Yet, failing to revisit early decisions can lead to design-induced costs during production. Josiah points out that understanding the original intent of a design can reveal where simplifications or changes are feasible without compromising the product’s appeal.
This highlights a unique advantage consultancies like Sundberg-Ferar offer: the ability to operate across silos. They bring a bird’s-eye view of the entire product development process, from styling to tooling, ensuring that no team operates in isolation. It’s a perspective that followers of Munro & Associates — especially those in engineering or product strategy roles — know to be invaluable.
Smart Structural Trade-Offs
Another insightful topic raised in the walkaround involves the design of the battery pack and floor structure in electric trucks. Rather than adopting Tesla’s flat-floor approach — which necessitates building up all the interior support — the Maverick and similar vehicles maintain a raised center tunnel. While this sacrifices flatness, it enables the center console to provide structure itself, reducing the need for additional reinforcements.
This reflects a core engineering principle: don’t eliminate structure unless you can replace it efficiently. A raised tunnel may seem outdated, but in the right context, it becomes a strength — both literally and financially.
Styling Without Over-Styling
Later in the tour, the discussion turns to the BMW XM and its polarizing design elements. While the exterior skin may look cohesive in renderings, the physical execution reveals issues with alignment, protrusion, and expansion-related distortion. Mismatched panel heights, visible gaps, and differing thermal expansion rates between metal and plastic trim pieces all serve as cautionary tales. These are the details where hours of design-for-manufacture debate are often lost to aesthetic ambition.
It’s here that lean design principles again assert their importance. Every millimeter matters — not just in visual appeal, but in labor hours, tooling complexity, and quality control. As Josiah notes, high-end buyers may not immediately notice these tolerances — but over time, these are the flaws that degrade perceived quality and brand trust.
Conclusion: Rethinking Automotive Priorities
The Maverick’s interior design proves that restraint can be revolutionary. By focusing on essential functions, using fewer parts, and prioritizing manufacturability, Ford has delivered a vehicle that feels smart, usable, and refreshingly honest. For automotive engineers, designers, and enthusiasts alike, it’s a case study in the power of simplicity.
As Munro continues to spotlight examples like this, one thing is clear: the future belongs to vehicles that are not just high-tech or stylish, but also thoughtfully built from the inside out.
Explore More With Munro
Ready to dive deeper into the engineering decisions that shape today’s most efficient vehicles? Subscribe to Munro Live or follow us at Munro & Associates for exclusive teardowns, expert design analysis, and real-world insights that empower engineers, investors, and EV enthusiasts alike.
Join the conversation — where smarter design drives the future.