Skip to content 
For automotive engineers, EV enthusiasts, and investors alike, this Nissan Ariya interior review offers expert teardown insights on how design decisions impact cost, user experience, and lean manufacturing. The Ariya, Nissan’s flagship electric crossover, targets a growing market segment — but with an asking price of nearly $60,000 USD, how well does its interior deliver on value?
At Munro & Associates, we constantly evaluate whether OEMs are putting money into the right places. That’s core to our teardown philosophy: showing how each design choice affects not just aesthetics, but manufacturability, material efficiency, assembly complexity, and — ultimately — consumer satisfaction.
Here’s our breakdown of the Ariya’s interior: where Nissan has spent wisely, where corners were cut, and where opportunities for leaner design remain.
Paint and Exterior Styling: A Smart Start
First impressions matter. The Ariya’s metallic blue paint performs well for both photography and showroom appeal. Compared to solid white or black, the color reveals body panel nuances, highlighting Nissan’s exterior styling decisions.
The front fascia embraces a grille-less EV look while incorporating texture to maintain visual interest and aerodynamic efficiency. Minimal piano black trim and restrained chrome elements create a sleeker aesthetic than some rivals.
Overall, the exterior demonstrates sound design discipline — achieving a premium impression without unnecessary cost additions.
The $60K Question: Interior Expectations vs. Reality
Here’s where things get more complex. While the Ariya starts at lower price points, this particular model is priced at $59,000 — and at that level, customer expectations rise sharply.
In the cabin, Nissan blends clever cost-saving strategies with questionable trade-offs:
Screen and Dashboard Integration
The Ariya sports a large, dual-screen setup — visually impactful but not a seamless single panel. Surrounding the screens is a stitched, wrapped dashboard panel featuring minimal seams, likely designed to reduce manufacturing cost while providing a clean look.
Beneath that is a faux woodgrain trim with an in-mold texture, offering an open-pore feel without the maintenance drawbacks of real wood. It’s an effective way to balance perceived luxury with lean cost management.
However, much of the remaining dash is basic injection-molded plastic — a design choice that would be acceptable in a $45K vehicle but feels sparse at $60K.
The Center Console Conundrum
Perhaps the most debatable interior element is the center console. The powered sliding upper armrest is mechanically complex, but delivers little practical benefit. It sacrifices valuable storage volume — a feature many drivers expect in a premium crossover.
The lower portion of the console remains fixed to accommodate rear heat ducts, further limiting space. Added to this is the cost of power actuation, additional ducting complexity, and the tooling required for a moving duct assembly.
Is this feature cascaded across the entire Ariya platform to save inventory complexity? If so, economies of scale could somewhat justify it. But as a customer-facing feature, it lacks perceived value — especially when that value could have been delivered through greater storage utility.
Seat Materials and Ergonomics
Seat surfaces blend vinyl with perforated panels and artificial suede inserts — a practical choice for durability, cleanability, and thermal comfort. Artificial suede performs better than real suede for everyday use, avoiding issues with heat retention and wear.
Still, headroom and seating geometry present challenges. The raised floor, necessitated by the battery pack, elevates seating position and can push taller drivers uncomfortably close to the headliner. It’s a known constraint across many EV platforms, but one worth noting for potential buyers.
Stitch Quality and Long-term Durability
In any teardown, stitch quality is a telling detail. Close inspection of the Ariya’s seat stitching reveals oblong holes already stretching the material — a red flag for long-term durability.
If shrinkage occurs (a real risk with heat cycles), seams could split — requiring costly repair. Restitching a seat cover can run $300–$500, as full disassembly and reassembly are needed.
Engineers and buyers alike should watch for these subtle quality indicators when evaluating long-term value.
Rear Seats: Consistent but Cost-conscious
In the back, Nissan maintains material consistency — no hard plastic seat backs, and rear door panels mirror front-row quality. That’s good news for overall brand perception.
However, the rear center console follows the same pattern: sacrificed storage space in favor of ducting and moving mechanisms, with no additional storage cubby provided.
The rear cargo area uses a split-panel floor with two separate handles — a mixed bag. On one hand, it offers flexibility for partial access when the trunk is loaded. On the other, it adds cost and manufacturing complexity (extra handles, adhesive, and edge wrapping) for a benefit that may not sway many customers.
No Frunk, No Shock-Supported Hood
Finally, a key area where EV buyers expect added utility — the front trunk (frunk) — is notably absent. Despite a raised expectation at this price point, the Ariya lacks a frunk altogether and employs a basic prop rod for the hood instead of gas struts.
At $60K, this feels like a missed opportunity to differentiate against competitors who leverage front cargo space as a unique EV selling point.
Final Thoughts: Value vs. Cost
Overall, the Nissan Ariya interior reflects thoughtful design in some areas — especially where lean design and smart material choices come into play. The metallic paint, clean dashboard surfacing, and cost-effective faux woodgrain are clear wins.
However, several choices — the overcomplicated center console, limited storage, potential stitch durability concerns, and the absence of a frunk — leave this $59,000 model feeling less competitive than it should.
For $45K, the interior would stand out as a solid value proposition. At nearly $60K, expectations shift: customers rightly demand both perceived and practical benefits to match the premium price.
As always, what’s unseen in this review is how much of the cost goes into the Ariya’s battery pack and drivetrain. If the vehicle excels there, some of the interior shortcomings could be forgiven. But from a pure interior teardown perspective, Nissan has room to improve in aligning cost with customer-perceived value.
Explore More with Munro
Want deeper teardown insights, lean design reviews, and expert EV cost breakdowns? Subscribe to Munro Live for in-depth analysis on the latest electric vehicles, manufacturing innovations, and industry trends. Whether you’re an engineer, EV enthusiast, or investor, Munro helps you stay ahead of the curve.